King & Spalding's competencies (Lawfirms' directories)
Practice Area | Jurisdiction | Rank | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | Last Quarter |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial Law | UNITED STATES | 25 | 2240 | 3763 | 4 | ![]() |
Competition Law | BELGIUM | 35 | 750 | 25 | 1 | ![]() |
Competition Law | UNITED STATES | 53 | 2395 | 4015 | 5 | ![]() |
Corporate M&A | UNITED ARAB EMIRATES | 9 | 200 | 3333 | 3 | ![]() |
Corporate M&A | SINGAPORE | 19 | 1500 | 150 | 1 | ![]() |
Corporate M&A | RUSSIAN FEDERATION | 20 | 5 | 600 | 1 | ![]() |
Corporate M&A | UNITED STATES | 38 | 26470 | 1535 | 26 | ![]() |
Corporate M&A | FRANCE | 41 | 1910 | 95 | 11 | ![]() |
Corporate M&A | UNITED KINGDOM | 66 | 1770 | 81 | 4 | ![]() |
Debt Capital Markets | UNITED KINGDOM | 57 | 350 | 25 | 1 | ![]() |
Practice Area | Jurisdiction | Rank | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | Last Quarter |
Showing 1 to 10 of 30 entries
Client Reviews
Client Reviews provides a qualitative rating based on Partners' Clients feedback assessmentCommunication Skills
Technical skills
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Perceived Added Value
Ranking 2022: King & Spalding
Showing 1 to 10 of 28 entries
Ranking 2021: King & Spalding
Ranking 2020: King & Spalding
Significant Clients
The chart shows a balanced list of the King & Spalding's client portfolio - based on PBV Monitor's Analyzed Transactions during last Twelve MounthsTeam
The chart shows a balanced list of King & Spalding partners - based on PBV Monitor's analyzed transactions during last Twelve MounthsCo-Counsel
The Chart shows a balanced list of King & Spalding's Co-Counsel Law Firm - based on PBV Monitor's analyzed transactions during last Twelve MounthsCounterparts
The Chart shows a balanced list of King & Spalding's other Firms involved - based on PBV Monitor's analyzed transactions during last Twelve MounthsPeer Reviews
The Peer Reviews provides a qualitative rating based on Counterparts / Referees' feedback assessmentRecent experiences
LLT Management's Trade Libel Case2/27/2025