Tax Finance
Rank | Name | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | Last Quarter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Davis Polk & Wardwell | 50445 | 4542 | 37 | na | na | na | na | na | |
2 | Kirkland & Ellis | 32100 | 1510 | 13 | na | na | na | na | na | |
3 | Debevoise & Plimpton | 24750 | 2356 | 8 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
4 | Slaughter and May | 19410 | 4185 | 15 | na | na | na | na | na | |
5 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | 14685 | 2790 | 13 | na | na | na | na | na | |
6 | Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | 12350 | 10000 | 4 | na | na | na | na | na | |
7 | Shearman & Sterling | 9795 | 7270 | 10 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
8 | Latham & Watkins | 8585 | 4637 | 12 | 96% | 98% | 98% | 95% | 98% | |
9 | Macfarlanes LLP | 7900 | 781 | 8 | na | na | na | na | na | |
10 | Herbert Smith Freehills | 5150 | 1717 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
11 | Goodwin Procter | 4200 | 2217 | 6 | na | na | na | na | na | |
12 | Milbank LLP | 3500 | 3210 | 5 | na | na | na | na | na | |
13 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges | 3250 | 1294 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
14 | White & Case | 2800 | 2574 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
15 | Skadden | 2250 | 1694 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
16 | Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | 2200 | 3700 | 3 | 75% | 88% | 88% | 75% | 88% | |
17 | Clifford Chance | 1750 | 6667 | 3 | 75% | 100% | 100% | 75% | 100% | |
18 | Baker McKenzie | 1500 | 10000 | 1 | 90% | 95% | 95% | 95% | 95% | |
19 | Allen & Overy | 1500 | 6667 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 85% | 90% | 95% | |
20 | Hogan Lovells | 1500 | 1500 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 100% | 75% | |
21 | Dechert | 1500 | 75 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
22 | Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson | 1450 | 1775 | 3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
23 | Proskauer Rose | 900 | 763 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
24 | Simmons & Simmons | 750 | 150 | 1 | 93% | 93% | 89% | 98% | 86% | |
25 | Cooley LLP | 700 | 88 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
26 | Sidley Austin LLP | 700 | 88 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
27 | Eversheds Sutherland | 250 | 600 | 1 | 100% | 94% | 100% | 88% | 94% | |
28 | Osborne Clarke | 230 | 2858 | 3 | 88% | 88% | 88% | 63% | 75% | |
29 | Burges Salmon | 150 | 3500 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
30 | Charles Russell Speechlys | 30 | 25 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
31 | Paul Hastings LLP | 25 | 5000 | 1 | 75% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
32 | DLA Piper | 25 | 25 | 1 | 93% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 96% | |
33 | Addleshaw Goddard | 15 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
34 | Travers Smith | 5 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
35 | Fieldfisher | 1 | 25 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 94% | 100% | 100% | |
Rank | Name | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | Last Quarter |