Competition Law
Rank | Name | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | Last Quarter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Schima Mayer Starlinger Rechtsanwälte | 15000 | 250 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
2 | Schoenherr | 1600 | 1604 | 7 | na | na | na | na | na | |
3 | Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP | 1065 | 3750 | 4 | 88% | 100% | 94% | 96% | 94% | |
4 | Baker McKenzie | 650 | 5000 | 1 | 90% | 95% | 95% | 95% | 95% | |
5 | Eisenberger & Herzog | 625 | 894 | 4 | na | na | na | na | na | |
6 | CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz | 375 | 2700 | 5 | na | na | na | na | na | |
7 | Binder Grösswang Rechtsanwälte GmbH | 175 | 3558 | 3 | na | na | na | na | na | |
8 | DORDA | 170 | 25 | 3 | na | na | na | na | na | |
9 | bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte | 165 | 1700 | 3 | na | na | na | na | na | |
10 | Wolf Theiss | 30 | 4625 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
11 | Barnert, Egermann, Illigasch | 15 | 150 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
12 | Herbst Kinsky | 15 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
Rank | Name | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | Last Quarter |