Public Law
Rank | Name | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | Last Quarter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Latham & Watkins | 160905 | 2280 | 49 | 96% | 98% | 98% | 95% | 98% | |
2 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges | 88570 | 3103 | 29 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
3 | Cravath Swaine & Moore | 53305 | 4840 | 37 | na | na | na | na | na | |
4 | Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | 34871 | 4806 | 27 | na | na | na | na | na | |
5 | Sidley Austin LLP | 32255 | 1408 | 29 | na | na | na | na | na | |
6 | Kirkland & Ellis | 31135 | 1411 | 33 | na | na | na | na | na | |
7 | Sullivan & Cromwell | 25000 | 5000 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
8 | Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel | 20045 | 506 | 4 | na | na | na | na | na | |
9 | Vinson & Elkins LLP | 18970 | 1992 | 40 | na | na | na | na | na | |
10 | Hogan Lovells | 17800 | 3000 | 4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 100% | 75% | |
11 | Baker Botts LLP | 14980 | 3906 | 14 | na | na | na | na | na | |
12 | Cooley LLP | 14600 | 242 | 28 | na | na | na | na | na | |
13 | White & Case | 11040 | 2552 | 12 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
14 | Norton Rose Fulbright | 8500 | 10000 | 1 | 96% | 96% | 96% | 92% | 96% | |
15 | Covington & Burling LLP | 7150 | 567 | 3 | na | na | na | na | na | |
16 | Dechert | 6655 | 1211 | 19 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
17 | Winston & Strawn | 6275 | 729 | 21 | na | na | na | na | na | |
18 | Bracewell LLP | 5030 | 1456 | 9 | na | na | na | na | na | |
19 | Baker McKenzie | 4350 | 3500 | 2 | 90% | 95% | 95% | 95% | 95% | |
20 | Holland & Knight | 4340 | 2257 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 92% | 100% | 100% | |
21 | Locke Lord | 4100 | 1167 | 18 | na | na | na | na | na | |
22 | King & Spalding | 3215 | 2356 | 8 | na | na | na | na | na | |
23 | Schiff Hardin LLP | 3155 | 120 | 5 | na | na | na | na | na | |
24 | McDermott Will & Emery | 2900 | 1185 | 10 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | |
25 | Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | 2500 | 5000 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
26 | Alston & Bird LLP | 2155 | 1488 | 4 | na | na | na | na | na | |
27 | K&L Gates | 2005 | 669 | 4 | 94% | 97% | 94% | 94% | 91% | |
28 | Foley Hoag LLP | 1970 | 1269 | 4 | na | na | na | na | na | |
29 | Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | 1545 | 3649 | 3 | na | na | na | na | na | |
30 | Arnold & Porter | 1505 | 50 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
31 | Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | 1395 | 81 | 4 | na | na | na | na | na | |
32 | Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton | 1200 | 958 | 12 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
33 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | 1180 | 736 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
34 | Ropes & Gray | 1145 | 633 | 3 | na | na | na | na | na | |
35 | Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr | 975 | 25 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
36 | Hanson Bridgett | 965 | 1413 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
37 | Squire Patton Boggs | 950 | 850 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
38 | Blank Rome LLP | 920 | 973 | 14 | na | na | na | na | na | |
39 | Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | 715 | 2417 | 3 | 92% | 92% | 94% | 90% | 90% | |
40 | Thompson Knight LLP | 700 | 25 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
41 | Jackson Walker L.L.P. | 645 | 115 | 5 | na | na | na | na | na | |
42 | Dentons | 545 | 50 | 2 | 89% | 95% | 91% | 91% | 91% | |
43 | Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP | 535 | 2150 | 4 | na | na | na | na | na | |
44 | Vedder Price | 450 | 10000 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
45 | Paul Hastings LLP | 450 | 250 | 1 | 75% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
46 | Reed Smith | 400 | 2500 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
47 | Foley & Lardner LLP | 330 | 81 | 4 | na | na | na | na | na | |
48 | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | 285 | 138 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
49 | Holland & Hart LLP | 165 | 88 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
50 | Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson | 150 | 10000 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
51 | Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner | 150 | 75 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
52 | Haynes and Boone | 110 | 25 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
53 | Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. | 95 | 150 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
54 | Loeb & Loeb LLP | 95 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
55 | Taft Stettinius & Hollister | 70 | 50 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
56 | Crowell & Moring LLP | 65 | 5000 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
57 | Stoel Rives | 55 | 1500 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
58 | Fox Rothschild LLP | 55 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
59 | Goodwin Procter | 50 | 50 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
60 | Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | 36 | 2513 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
61 | Sills Cummis & Gross | 25 | 88 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
62 | Farella Braun + Martel | 25 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
63 | Perkins Coie | 25 | 25 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
64 | Snell & Wilmer | 25 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
65 | Starkey, Kelly, Kenneally, Cunningham & Turnbach | 25 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
66 | Greenberg Traurig LLP | 15 | 3500 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
67 | Nixon Peabody LLP | 15 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
68 | Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP | 6 | 200 | 2 | na | na | na | na | na | |
69 | Venable LLP | 5 | 850 | 1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 75% | |
70 | Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan | 5 | 75 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
71 | Ballard Spahr LLP | 5 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
72 | Beveridge & Diamond | 5 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
73 | Drummond Woodsum & Macmahon | 5 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
74 | Greenberg Glusker LLP | 5 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
75 | Kelley Drye & Warren LLP | 5 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
76 | Wiggin & Dana-Nh | 5 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
77 | Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC | 1 | 25 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
Rank | Name | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | Last Quarter |